Skip to content

Germany's antitrust chief slams EU plan to ease merger rules as risky

A top antitrust expert calls the EU's merger reform a threat to fair markets. His warning: fewer giants won't mean better deals for consumers—or stronger global firms.

The image shows a diagram of the organizational structure of the European Union, with flags...
The image shows a diagram of the organizational structure of the European Union, with flags representing the countries involved in the organization. The text on the diagram provides further details about the organization, such as the names of the departments and their respective roles.

Germany's antitrust chief slams EU plan to ease merger rules as risky

Tomaso Duso, head of Germany’s Monopolies Commission, has criticised the European Commission’s plans to loosen merger rules. In an interview with Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland, he warned that such changes could harm competition and consumers without clear benefits. Duso challenged the idea that future mergers should be approved more easily based on promised cost savings. He argued that these savings rarely translate into lower prices for consumers. Instead, they often result in job losses and reduced competition.

He also dismissed claims that Europe needs mega-mergers to create globally competitive firms. According to Duso, there is no solid evidence to support this argument. As an example, he cited the blocked Siemens-Alstom merger, which he said proved that strong competition within Europe boosts international competitiveness. Duso further warned that allowing a few corporate giants to dominate would stifle long-term innovation. It would also create new economic dependencies, weakening the market. He demanded that companies provide verifiable proof that any gains from mergers would actually reach consumers before approvals are granted.

The Monopolies Commission chair’s remarks highlight concerns over the potential consequences of relaxed merger rules. Without clear consumer benefits, he argues, such changes risk reducing competition and harming innovation in the long run.

Read also:

Latest