Skip to content

Why the 1976 ENMOD Treaty Fails to Regulate Modern Climate Engineering Risks

A 1970s treaty never anticipated today’s climate interventions. Without reform, unchecked geoengineering could trigger irreversible cross-border disasters.

On the right there are car, plants, current pole, grass and soil. On the left there are plants,...
On the right there are car, plants, current pole, grass and soil. On the left there are plants, flowers, trees, fencing, house and a pole. Sky is sunny.

Why the 1976 ENMOD Treaty Fails to Regulate Modern Climate Engineering Risks

The Environmental Modification Convention: Revisiting the Treaty for Contemporary Climate Engineering Governance

Authored By: Somya Mittal University Institute of Legal Studies, Panjab University, Chandigarh Abstract As the climate crisis worsens, climate engineering [...]

2025-12-07T16:21:08+00:00

environmental-science, personal-finance, data-and-cloud-computing, casino-and-gambling

Climate engineering is gaining attention as a possible way to quickly lower global temperatures. Techniques like Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and large-scale Carbon Capture Schemes (CDR) offer potential solutions but also carry risks of unpredictable cross-border effects. Experts now question whether existing laws can properly govern these emerging technologies.

The ENMOD Convention, adopted in 1976, was designed to prevent hostile environmental changes for military use. Its rules, however, focus only on deliberate harm and outdated 1970s technology. Since peaceful climate interventions were not considered at the time, ENMOD fails to address modern challenges.

The study highlights the need for updated international rules to manage climate engineering safely. Without reform, existing laws like ENMOD will remain inadequate for modern challenges. A new framework under the UNFCCC could provide clearer guidance and prevent unintended global consequences.

Read also:

Latest