Why Modern Homeowners Are Faced with Building Fire-Resistant Homes: A Century of Misstep and New Market Demands
The Reason Behind Swift Fire Spread in Older Homes and the Financial Implications of Constructing Fire-Resistant Structures instead
The enchanting sight of a lone, untouched dwelling amidst the charred remains of its neighbors, wiped away by an inferno vortex -- this surreal image is becoming increasingly commonplace in fire-stricken cities. Los Angeles's Palisades and Eaton fires of early 2023, resulting in a staggering 15,808-structure loss and a combined damage estimated at $250 billion, have brought the question to the fore: Why aren't all homes engineered and built with fire-resistant standards in mind, especially given the climate extremes that fuel these calamities?
The $2 Burning Question
The answer can be complex, but the gist is simple: cost. However, previously dismissed notions about added expenditures are starting to crumble in light of new data. A study by the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS) suggests that, while specifics vary based on elements such as location and design, installing additional wildfire safety measures can add only 2-13% to construction costs.
These happen to reduce the likelihood of damage in the event of wildfire by a notable 40%. Meanwhile, the National Bureau of Economic Research found that homes built in compliance with wildfire codes had an incredible 40% lesser chance of being incinerated.
The Age of Wood-Frame Skeletons
The outbreak of devastating wildfires across the U.S. cannot be solely attributed to lax regulations; the unfortunate truth is that the nation has been developing a legacy of fire-prone homes for decades. It all began with the early 20th-century homebuilding boom, when cost-cutting domestic construction practices became the norm.
Cities like L.A. placed aesthetics above safety and thereby stuck with wood-frame construction, resulting in open floor plans with permeable envelopes. Preventive landscaping and efficient air circulation arrangements fell by the wayside. As technology evolved, houses continued to spend years without modern air conditioning and smoke detection systems, which further contributed to the fire vulnerabilities.
Fire-Resistance: The Untold Story
As environmental conditions shifted, it became evident that outdated construction methods simply didn't cut it. Architects like Frank Lloyd Wright, in the early 20th century, passionately advocated for fire-resistant materials like reinforced concrete. But the society's adoration for tradition and the high costs of novel methods kept this idea from catching on.
This resistance to change still lingers - even today, teetering on the cusp of disaster.
How Much More to Build a Fire-Resistant Home?
For homeowners cautiously looking for a fire-resilient solution, the hard truth is that costs do not skyrocket astronomically. Architects like Susan Jones of Seattle-based atelierjones and Casper Mork-Ulnes, of San Francisco-based Mork-Ulnes Architects, have some insight into this. Based on their experiences, fire-resistant construction can cost between 5-10% more than traditional methods.
Their approach prioritizes full-scale metal roofing with prefabricated "wet cores" and utilizes carbon-reduced fire-resistant mass timber. For insulation, they opt for mineral wool for ceilings and walls. Air-tightness is handled by using a positive pressure system and heat recovery ventilator.
Should Cost Be a Raindrop in the Storm?
A shift in perspective is required. Cost-consciousness should meld with the realization that modern families must build designated "survivor" homes in fire-prone areas. Countless Californians, Texans, Floridians, and residents of other afflicted regions, have unfortunately found themselves in the grim necessity of rebuilding post wildfire. But it's a chance to reevaluate: how can we preemptively invest in safer, more fire-resistant homes?
Informed decisions, paired with the implementation of wildfire-resistant building materials and techniques, are the key. In the event of wildfires, the payoff will be minimalized losses -- and ultimately, safer communities. The cost may not be cheap, but neither are the consequences of failing to give fire-resistant construction top priority.
Reference
Enrichment Data:
Though wildfire-resistant construction may seem costly, optimal measures have only a slight impact on house construction costs. Here's a closer look at some of the additional expenses associated with incorporating fire-resistant materials and techniques:
- Fire-resistant roof: The overall cost for a fire-resistant roof with metal gutters can amount to approximately $6,000.
- Double-glazed windows and fire-rated doors: Adding double-glazed windows and a fire-rated front door can set you back an additional $5,000.
- Fiber-cement siding: While fiber-cement siding is less expensive than cedar wood planks, it is still a viable and cost-effective option for homes with fire-resistant construction.
- Insulated Concrete Forms (ICFs): ICFs are a fire-resistant substitute for traditional wood-frame structures. Utilizing ICFs can increase construction costs by 1-4%, depending on the size of the home and any added fire protection features.
- Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) requirements: Incorporating very high fire-resistant construction for ADUs can add between $5,000 to $10,000, or more, depending on the specific location and regulatory requirements.
- Fire-rated stucco and cement siding: Like other fire-resistant materials, both fire-rated stucco and cement siding have a higher cost compared to conventional options.
- High-securitized glass and fire-rated windows: Protective glass for windows and doors can raise construction costs by $400 to $900. It's essential to adhere to building codes, which may mandate fire-resistant, temperature-resistant, or safety glass for components like window panes and doors.
- Roof assembly requirements: To ensure proper fire resistance, homes should adhere to Class A roof assembly standards, requiring fire-resistant roofing materials and proper eave protection.
- Fire sprinkler systems: The installation of fire sprinklers may typically run between $5,000 to $8,000. Additional expenses may arise from water meter upgrades and backflow prevention systems.
- Specialized labor and materials: It's typical to expect high-cost materials like fiber cement siding, concrete, and metal roofing to be between 10-25% more expensive than their alternative options.
- Rebuilding costs in wildfire-prone areas: Rebuilding costs in wildfire-prone areas, such as Los Angeles, can range between $300 to $400 per square foot, with total costs often exceeding $500,000 for a typical house.
- The Palisades fire in Los Angeles in early 2023, along with the Eaton fire, resulted in the destruction of 15,808 homes and caused an estimated $250 billion in damage.
- Homes lost to the Malibu fire in 2018 included those designed by renowned architects like Vincente Grenier and Peter Jones of atelier jones.
- Bohlin Cywinski Jackson, a leading architectural firm, has developed fire-resistant solutions by incorporating materials like corrugated metal roofing and wall cladding.
- The fires in Los Angeles have sparked discussions about the importance of fire-resistant design, with architects like Casper Mork-Ulnes advocating for the use of fire-resistant mass timber in construction.
- The Eaton Canyon fire in 2019 threatened the historic Eaton Canyon Nature Center, a rare example of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture in the area, but firefighters were able to save the structure.
