Skip to content

The Court Ruled that the Commission Failed to Comply with Obligations Stipulated under Article 85 (1) of the Treaty.

Implemented in significant business deals across Canada, the United States, and internationally.

Court Determines Commission's Neglect of Duties Under Article 85 (1) of the Treaty.
Court Determines Commission's Neglect of Duties Under Article 85 (1) of the Treaty.

The Court Ruled that the Commission Failed to Comply with Obligations Stipulated under Article 85 (1) of the Treaty.

In a significant legal victory, Toronto-based Nieuport Aviation secured a judgment of over 130 million dollars from Porter Airlines Inc., following a four-week trial that took place at the end of 2021 and the beginning of 2022. The case, which has yet to receive extensive coverage in search results, is a precedent-setting decision in force majeure law.

The legal team representing Nieuport Aviation was led by Adam Hirsh and Shawn Irving, with the support of several other lawyers including Jacqueline Code, Lia Bruschetta, Sonja Pavic, Marleigh Dick, Jayne Cooke, and Jesse Cohen. The team's diverse composition, featuring both men and women, played a significant role in the outcome of the case.

The case centred around three key contractual questions: whether Porter Airlines was obligated to pay fees under its license agreement with Nieuport Aviation, if Porter could invoke the force majeure clause to avoid paying fees during its voluntary suspension of services for 18 months during the COVID-19 pandemic, and if it was unreasonable for Nieuport to charge fees during the pandemic.

In the court's ruling, it accepted Nieuport's position on each of these questions. Porter Airlines was found to be obligated to pay the fees as outlined in the license agreement, and the company could not invoke the force majeure clause to avoid paying fees during its voluntary suspension of services. It was also determined that it was not unreasonable for Nieuport to charge fees during the pandemic.

Nieuport Aviation, the owner of the terminal at Billy Bishop Airport in Toronto, was well-prepared for the trial, with Jacqueline Code conducting thorough research to support the legal team's arguments. The team's efforts were successful, as evidenced by the judgment in favour of Nieuport Aviation.

This case sets a significant precedent in force majeure law, confirming and clarifying several important principles. It underscores the importance of carefully defining force majeure events in contracts and the need for unforeseeable events to truly excuse contractual performance. In cases where performance is made impracticable or impossible, courts will typically rule in favour of the party that can demonstrate such circumstances.

For those seeking detailed insights on this case, legal databases, court records, or specific references would provide further assistance. The Porter Airlines Inc. v. Nieuport Aviation dispute serves as a valuable example of how force majeure law is applied in practice, offering valuable lessons for parties involved in similar contractual disputes.

The legal team, led by Adam Hirsh and Shawn Irving, successfully argued that Nieuport Aviation should receive over 130 million dollars from Porter Airlines Inc. in a business dispute centered around finance-related contractual questions. The case, which is a significant precedent-setting decision in force majeure law, highlights the importance of defining force majeure events in contracts and the need for unforeseeable events to excuse contractual performance.

Read also:

    Latest