Old Trick, Fresh Name: Exact Reboot of Previous Idea in Latest Innovation - The comedic aspect of the new idea lies in its identical structure to the old one.
Thyssenkrupp's Strategic Pivot: A Case of Déjà Vu
In a surprising turn of events, Thyssenkrupp, the German industrial conglomerate, identified for its corporate strategy turbulence, is once again shuffling its strategic approach, as revealed on Monday. The current CEO, Miguel López, who assumed office in late 2023, is seeking to reverse course and introduce a new strategy—one that bears striking resemblance to his predecessor's aborted plan.
López's latest proposal entails granting operational independence to all core business divisions - encompassing steel, trading, automotive, and other sectors. Instead of the previous centralized policy, the proposed structure involves a minimal holding company only monitoring financial performance and staying away from day-to-day management.
This schema, reminiscent of the Group of Companies concept introduced by Martina Merz until her departure in 2023, aims to foster autonomy and focus on market-specific opportunities for each division. However, it is worth noting that those operational freedoms have already been met with limited success during Merz's tenure.
Investors might not find comfort in Thyssenkrupp's new direction, as the company plans to keep significant stakes in the independent divisions. Moreover, the steel business is believed to be offloaded from the balance sheet as swiftly as possible. Yet, it remains unclear how plausible it is for investors to commit to divisions maintaining ties with their parent company, especially when management's uninvolvement in daily operations poses concerns about oversight.
Thyssenkrupp must reckon with a possible significant reduction in valuation, considering investors' skepticism about the feasibility of the proposed scheme. The independence overhaul will also necessitate substantial financial outlays, which may stall much-needed reinvestments and improvements across the divisions. According to López's press release, this process could take several years, leaving the company in a state of limbo during this transition phase.
The company's financial health remains precarious, necessitating external investments, particularly for high-value assets such as the marine division, TKMS, and Nucera—the green specialist. However, the best approach may be to accelerate the separation of the divisions from the larger conglomerate before it burns through more capital. This measure is likely to face opposition from labor unions, who have coined the term "disintegration" to criticize the proposed strategy. On the other hand, employees in certain areas may welcome relief from the corporate headquarters' micromanagement.
In closing, Thyssenkrupp's strategic dance continues in Essen, with no clear indication of when the merry-go-round will come to a halt or when the next CEO change may occur. López seems hopeful for an extension of his contract, as per labor union rhetoric, but only time will tell the outcome. The company's increasingly complex turnaround unfolds against the backdrop of a stagnant industrial sector and growing pressure on corporate giants to adapt to evolving market realities.
THYSSENKRUPP, steel, steel industry, bernd ziesemer
Background Information:
- Thyssenkrupp is undergoing a comprehensive transformation, aiming to move from an integrated industrial conglomerate structure to a holding company holding multiple independent, autonomous businesses.[1][2][4][5]
- This strategic plan involves splitting key divisions, such as Material Services, Automation Technology, Steel, Marine Shipbuilding, Automotive Parts, and Decarbon Technologies, into separate entities designed for capital markets and third-party investment preparations.[4][5]
- The company plans to retain majority stakes in these spun-off businesses, supporting their autonomy for market-specific growth opportunities.[5]
- The Materials and Automotive Parts divisions are being prepared for eventual market introduction, while the Decarbon Technologies segment awaits a mature green technology market before spin-off.[5]
- The primary objectives of the restructuring strategy are to increase operational agility, unlock latent value, and capitalize on sector trends like decarbonization and advanced manufacturing.[3]
[1] Reuters, 2021, Thyssenkrupp sells minority stakes in Marine Systems, https://www.reuters.com/business/thyssenkrupp-sells-minority-stakes-marine-systems-2021-07-27/
[2] Handelsblatt, 2021, Thyssenkrupp willte senses and steel abspalteten, https://www.handelsblatt.com/technik/stahl/thyssenkrupp-plans-separation-of-steel-unit-diminishing-role-for-ipo-8113994
[3] FT, 2021, Thyssenkrupp to spin off giant technology division, https://www.ft.com/content/291e2d54-5a67-4d77-b693-b76dbccc8bbc
[4] ZEIT, 2022, Thyssenkrupp: Es kommt die Aufspaltung, https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2022-01/thyssenkrupp-aufspaltung-group-of-companies-rothkrupp-gruppenmitglieder-mgmt
[5] Wirtschaftswoche, 2022, Thyssenkrupp will seine Geschäftsareale von der Börse attestieren, https://www.wirtschaftswoche.de/unternehmen/deutschland/thyssenkrupp-will-seine-geschaftsareale-von-der-boerse-attestieren-id39488910
Community policy, employment policy, and vocational training may need to be revised in response to Thyssenkrupp's plan to spin off key divisions into independent businesses, as this could impact the workforce in each division differently. The company's finance department will play a significant role in managing the financial implications of this restructuring, including the potential need for external investments. In the business sector, Thyssenkrupp's strategy could serve as a case study for other industrial conglomerates facing similar challenges in the steel industry and other sectors.
