Skip to content

New nursing law sparks fierce debate over resident protections and oversight cuts

Critics call it a dangerous rollback—proponents say it cuts red tape. Who’s right when vulnerable lives hang in the balance? The battle over nursing home reforms heats up.

in the picture there is a bedroom
in the picture there is a bedroom

Less Control and Input? Protest Against Care Act - New nursing law sparks fierce debate over resident protections and oversight cuts

A new nursing law in the state has triggered widespread debate. The social affairs minister claims the changes will cut bureaucracy and simplify regulations. But critics argue the reforms could weaken protections for vulnerable residents.

The proposed law removes mandatory oversight for ambulatory-assisted shared care apartments, often called Pflege-WGs. This shift has raised concerns about unclear management and the loss of independent complaint systems. Fifteen welfare clubs, including the BIVA-Pflegeschutzbund, warn that residents may face legal grey areas without proper safeguards.

The bill also extends the time between routine nursing home inspections. Currently, around one-third of facilities are checked yearly, but the rest would now face inspections only every five years. Unscheduled visits, prompted by specific concerns or Medical Review Board assessments, will continue as before.

Another major change is the removal of mandatory resident councils in nursing homes. Instead, institutions must only 'enable and promote' participation. Welfare groups argue this weakens residents’ influence over daily life and quality of care. They claim the law strips away a key tool for self-determination.

Opposition parties and care advocates fear the reforms could attract substandard providers. They warn that reduced oversight might open the door to exploitative practices. The minister, however, insists that residents’ self-determination and safety will remain protected under the new rules.

The law aims to reduce administrative burdens, but its impact on care standards remains disputed. Welfare associations and opposition groups continue to push for stronger resident protections. The final decision will determine whether the reforms balance efficiency with safety.

Read also:

Latest