Skip to content

Lukashenko labeled as a hateful fellow by a Russian economist.

No more financial support from the Kremlin for him.

Russian Expert Labels Lukashenko as a Contemptible Individual
Russian Expert Labels Lukashenko as a Contemptible Individual

Lukashenko labeled as a hateful fellow by a Russian economist.

In a recent development, Igor Lipstz, a prominent political analyst, has stated that Russia is unlikely to share its oil reserves with Belarus, as requested by Belarusian President Lukashenko. This decision is rooted in Russia's current economic contraction and financial difficulties.

Russia's economy has taken a significant hit, with its GDP shrinking by 4% in Q1 2025. This contraction has notably reduced Russia's capacity to supply financial assistance or support regional partners, including Belarus. Furthermore, falling oil prices and EU restrictions on Russian oil exports have further limited Russia's financial flexibility.

Belarus, on the other hand, is grappling with its own economic struggles. The country's GDP growth has slowed to a minimal 2.1% in H1 2025, and it is edging towards default amid diminishing Russian support. Inflation is on the rise, and the country faces a trade deficit, with sharply reduced exports to Russia—a key trading partner.

Despite ongoing official cooperation frameworks and trade discussions between Belarus and Russian regions such as Yakutia, these primarily focus on trade expansion and industrial collaboration rather than direct financial loans or substantial fiscal aid. The economic cooperation appears oriented toward supply chain and investment opportunities rather than cash financing.

Igor Lipstz, in his analysis, is certain that Lukashenko has no intention of paying any money to the oil workers. He also emphasised that the oil workers in Russia are patriotic, but they too require payment for their work. Lipstz compared the situation to the logic of: "Yes, he's a bastard, but he's our bastard."

In a somewhat contradictory statement, Lipstz suggested that Belarus should pay money for the oil, but he finds such a suggestion indecent. He further noted that the Russian oil company is a private company, and giving oil to Belarus would not generate revenue, as there would be expenses associated with paying the oil workers.

As the situation unfolds, it is clear that Russia, facing its own financial constraints, is unlikely to provide significant financing or loans to Belarus in the near future. This development underscores the challenges both countries are facing in maintaining their economic stability and regional partnership.

[1] Source: Financial Times [2] Source: TASS News Agency [3] Source: Belarusian Telegraph Agency [4] Source: Reuters [5] Source: Bloomberg

  1. The economic contraction and financial difficulties in Russia have affected its ability to share oil reserves with Belarus, which is a significant concern for the Belarusian personal-finance sector.
  2. The industrial sector might still benefit from the cooperation between Belarus and Russian regions like Yakutia, but the focus appears to shift away from direct financial loans and towards investment opportunities.
  3. In terms of politics and general-news, this struggle for oil reserves and financial assistance raises questions about the future of the partnership between Russia and Belarus, with potential ramifications for the broader regional business landscape.
  4. The crime-and-justice implications could also surface if Belarus fails to secure oil supplies and faces a worsening economy, as economic instability can often lead to social unrest and crime.

Read also:

    Latest