Skip to content

Editorial Letters: A Potential "Mutual Benefit Scenario" Arising from Refinery Closures

"Unwanted properties discarded by refiners, state benefits financially, another company profits, and consumers avoid overpricing – asserts an L.A. Times reader, concluding that the issue is resolved."

Editorial Letters: Potential Beneficial Outcome from Refinery Closures
Editorial Letters: Potential Beneficial Outcome from Refinery Closures

Editorial Letters: A Potential "Mutual Benefit Scenario" Arising from Refinery Closures

In a recent development, the possibility of state takeovers of abandoned refineries has emerged as a potential solution to prevent the closure of these industrial facilities, which could lead to supply shortages, price volatility, and job losses.

Phillips 66 and Valero, two major private refinery operators, have been contemplating the possibility of leaving the industry, but the specifics of this decision remain unclear. If they were to abandon their refineries, states could potentially step in to manage these assets, provided they have the necessary legal authority and policies in place.

The concept of eminent domain, which allows governments to seize private property for public use, could be a tool for states to acquire these refineries. However, it's important to note that this process would require extensive policy moves and regulatory authority, as taking over complex industrial operations is not a straightforward matter.

If states were to assume control of abandoned refineries, they could reap several financial benefits. For instance, stabilizing local fuel supplies would help avoid potential shortages and price volatility. Preserving jobs and economic activity associated with refinery operations would benefit local economies, and the state could potentially lower fuel prices over time by maintaining refinery capacity and competition.

Moreover, states could use this opportunity to implement environmental or operational reforms, improving efficiency and public health outcomes. It's worth mentioning that the California Democrats have recently proposed reforms to prevent refinery shutdowns.

Interestingly, another company might purchase the refineries for property value only, which could result in the current operators getting rid of unwanted properties. In such a scenario, another entity could make a profit from these assets.

It's also important to address concerns about fair pay for L.A. County employees, as a separate letter published in a local newspaper has highlighted. Joel Drum, a resident of Van Nuys, expressed his viewpoint about fair pay for L.A. County employees, stating that it should not be perceived as a burden on public resources.

In conclusion, while the prospect of state takeovers of refineries offers potential financial benefits, it's crucial to remember that the process would require careful consideration and comprehensive policy decisions. The primary advantages lie in securing fuel supply continuity, economic stability, and possibly lower consumer costs, while also providing opportunities for environmental and operational reforms.

  1. The state takeovers of abandoned refineries could potentially be facilitated through the use of eminent domain, a tool that allows governments to seize private property for public use.
  2. If states assume control of abandoned refineries, they could reap financial benefits such as stabilizing local fuel supplies to avoid potential shortages and price volatility.
  3. States could also lower fuel prices over time by maintaining refinery capacity and competition, and employing the workforce associated with these operations.
  4. Moreover, the state could use this opportunity to implement environmental or operational reforms, improving efficiency and public health outcomes, as suggested by the recent California Democrats' reform proposals.

Read also:

    Latest