Hey There, Folks!
Can Democracy be auctioned off? Insights into Donald Trump's strategy to claim an early triumph through electoral wagering.
Welcome to our last-ever US weekly recap! With just four days until Election Day, we're diving deep into the gambling realm to explore how a crypto-betting site might sway the historic 2024 US presidential election.
Over recent months, high-rolling accounts on Polymarket, a popular crypto-gambling site, have plunked down over $50 million on Donald Trump capturing the presidency, according to The Independent. These high-rollers, nicknamed Fredi9999, Theo4, PrincessCaro, and Michie, have all been linked to a French financial guru, and their bets have, surprisingly, tipped Polymarket's odds in Trump's favour. Currently, Trump's chances of victory are an astounding 66%, compared to traditional polls that have him at only 46.7% versus Kamala Harris's 48.1%.
Trump devotees are spreading rhetoric about his impending win
This situation showcases the power a single rich individual holds when manipulating online betting markets. While Polymarket claims the trader didn't intentionally boost Trump's odds, it highlights the impact money can have on shaping public perception. Trump supporters have eagerly picked up on this, sharing betting odds on social media as "proof" of Trump's inevitable victory. Furthermore, these predictions will only embolden right-wing activists to claim a "stolen election" if Trump fails to secure the win.
Even Elon Musk is in on the action, sharing Polymarket's statistics on X and asserting that betting odds are more reliable than polls because "money's on the line."
It's not just Americans participating in the Polymarket craze. They've found loopholes with the use of VPNs and cryptocurrency to wager from anywhere, contributing to the site's volume and visibility. Additionally, platforms such as Robinhood and Kalshi have joined the fray, with Kalshi even advertising on Right Side Broadcasting Network during Trump rallies to lure in Trump boosters.
However, the electoral risks presented by betting platforms haven't gone unnoticed. Politicians have voiced their worries about such sites, especially when it pertains to the security of democracy. In a letter written in August, senators—including Elizabeth Warren—expressed concern over platforms like Polymarket, claiming they threaten democracy by turning elections into financial speculations while introducing financial incentives that might skew voting motivations.
"If voters believe that democracy is up for sale to the highest bidder, trust in the system could be irreparably damaged," politicians warned.
An investigation by Chaos Labs and Inca Digital has revealed signs of potential market manipulation, with election betting accounting for roughly one-third of Polymarket's overall activity. This high concentration raises questions about whether the odds accurately represent actual voter sentiment or the influence of a few high-powered players.
Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan insists the platform is meant to offer a "truer" prediction method, stating "The market sets the price, not the operator. It's the invisible hand, not the thumb on the scale." In Coplan's view, betting platforms like Polymarket could eventually evolve into a marketplace for truth, shedding light on what he considers to be "real" insights.
Nevertheless, the betting mania surrounding Trump's skewed odds, and the threat of manipulation, highlights concerns about its impact on public perception and election integrity. As cryptocurrency betting platforms proliferate, questions remain about their influence in shaping opinions and actions, further muddying the waters between financial speculation and democratic participation.
Remember, just because people are betting big doesn't mean the numbers reflect reality!
Recommended Reading
- By Gavin Keene
- Donald Trump turns to his son and right-wing influencer Bo Loudon to rally young conservative voters
- By Michelle Woo
- Kamala Harris might clinch the US presidential election thanks to Brat Summer, Beyoncé, and the Swifties
- By Evan Williams
- 'It was a rush, something I should stop, but couldn't': Inside the growing problem of cryptocurrency addiction
Additional Insights
The use of crypto-gambling platforms like Polymarket can significantly impact the 2024 US presidential election in several ways:
- Enhanced Predictive Capabilities: Platforms that allow users to wager on outcomes using cryptocurrency can provide more precise predictions compared to traditional polls, as betting markets often reflect crowd-sourced probabilities.
- Influence on Public Perception: The odds presented by Polymarket can influence public belief on the candidates and their chances of winning. This might affect voter turnout or campaign tactics, as candidates may alter their messaging based on market predictions.
- Financial Involvement: The hefty financial stakes involved in these platforms can attract more attention and engagement from the public, potentially increasing the significance of the election.
- Social Media Integration: Integration between Polymarket and social media feeds allows real-time updates and analysis, amplifying its impact on public discourse and decision-making during the election.
- Regulatory Challenges: The use of cryptocurrency in these platforms raises regulatory concerns, as they function in a largely unregulated space, which might compromise the integrity of the electoral process.
- Ethical Implications: Commodifying political events through wagering on political outcomes using cryptocurrency raises ethical concerns, which might inflate the influence of money in politics.
- The 2024 US presidential election may witness a significant impact from crypto-gambling platforms like Polymarket, as their enhanced predictive capabilities and financial involvement attract more public attention and engagement.
- Furthermore, the influence of Polymarket on public perception and the potential regulatory challenges and ethical implications associated with commodifying political events could muddy the waters between financial speculation and democratic participation.
